If the young man was shooting off fireworks would his mom be facing those same charges? How does pursuing criminal charges serve better than a good chewing out?
I realize there's an element of danger with any explosive device and there's no guarantee of 100% safety even if you took all precautions, but this is overkill. It's another example of imagining the worst and accepting--now that it's determined there's any chance at all that it could happen--that it's highly likely to happen. There's no rational basis for that. If we thought like that about everything, would anybody fly in a plane or ride in a car?

3 comments:
Answer: Potato guns are covered by the Second Amendment, but dry ice bombs are not.
you have a potato gun? thats so cool.
Andrew
It's a lot of fun. Easy to build, too.
Post a Comment