Back in 2007, at Kathy's insistence, I finally had my hearing checked and received the word that everyone else already knew. I needed hearing aids which ended up costing me $3,000. It's been three years now and I must admit they have made a huge difference for me. It took a few months before putting them in my ears first thing in the morning became habitual. Getting my brain to relearn which sounds were ambient was a chore.
Me: "Man, that cuckoo clock ticks really loud."
Steph: "Dad, it's always been like that."
And who knew water coming from a faucet could be so loud. But after some months, I adjusted and now I definitely notice when I don't have them in.
So why do they cost so much? From one of the few articles (from 2004) I could find on the topic:
Congress amended the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to give the FDA regulatory power over all medical devices, and the FDA followed with the Hearing Aid Rule of 1977. It required consumers to see a physician to rule out a medical problem before getting a hearing aid. It also created an exception: Adults could bypass a doctor if they signed a waiver administered by a state-licensed hearing-aid dispenser. By signing, customers would acknowledge that they understood the dangers of skipping a full medical evaluation.
Today, two types of licensed specialists are the main vendors of hearing aids. State-licensed hearing-aid specialists need only a high-school education but have to pass tests proving their competence to administer hearing exams, fit devices and recognize underlying physical problems. Audiologists must have at least a master's degree, though they generally aren't medical doctors. After the FDA rule went into effect, audiologists changed their professional code of ethics and jumped into the business of selling hearing aids.
Under standards set by professional bodies, the specialists require a battery of tests and fitting sessions, driving up the cost. That results in the $2,200 average cost for hearing aids, a figure cited in an industry study sponsored by Knowles Electronics, an Illinois components maker.
I had my test done separately and it was covered by my insurance. The fitting sessions consisted of making molds of my ear canals and then making sure the hearing aids made from the molds fit properly. My hearing aid provider gave me the same answer of testing and fitting when I asked about the cost. When I remarked that a laptop computer has far more circuitry, capabilities, and power than a hearing aid and costs far less, he answered that chips are made for computers in far greater bulk than for hearing aids. I can't speak to that but it still didn't make me feel any better.
And then he told me that mine were actually cheaper than they could have been. The reason is that my digital aids have twelve bands that can adjust specific frequency ranges. However, my twelve bands were combined to make four. In other words, the capabilities of my hearing aids were purposely reduced to match what I needed. The cost difference is in how the software controls the hardware, not a difference in the hardware. That's hardly a comforting explanation, but that's all I've got.
What a coincidence, this very subject came up on Slashdot.